The
Internet has suppressed the sharing of opposite views and their
discussion, or so says recent studies. It takes little effort and even less
time to search and find sites, online newspapers and magazines, blogs, and
forums which support your views, whatever they may be. Believe that global warming
is a hoax, for
example? Google the phrase and over one million sites pop up. Or how about the
US government masterminded the 9/11 terrorist attacks? Over seven
million sites purport this as
fact. The potential effects on society, government, and human relations in the
future are immense.
With
little to no debate also comes imbalanced views and extremism, as niches of like-minded people engage in one-sided
discussions. If a group of supporters discussed the benefits of the Kyoto
Protocol, for example, it stands to reason that few arguments would get raised
about any possible negative impact. From this evaluation stems the idea that confidence grows with the
absence of persuasive naysayers. An overabundance of confidence produces extreme views - a mob mentality
on the Internet, if you will.
Unfortunately,
sociologists worry that the harm to society's general welfare is more likely
than any possible benefits. Suspicion of others whose views differ, unjustified
rage, and the fragmenting of society are all grave concerns. Any adversaries could be viewed as the enemy in some kind of
future war of ideals and beliefs.
This is an example of the type of text that can be used with an advanced student.Particular vocabulary is highlighted for discussion and clarity and there is a lot of scope to develop conversation with this kind of topic.